Home / Case Studies / Industrial Site Closure
Environmental Assessment

Industrial Site Closure Assessment

How GeoMeta connected a property owner with specialist environmental consultants to assess contamination at a former manufacturing site — enabling EPA approval and successful property transfer.

Specialist Matching PFAS Testing EPA Compliance
Environmental site assessment and remediation testing at a former industrial manufacturing site
8ha
Site Area
8 hectares
Site Area
8 months
Assessment Period
2 firms
Specialists Matched
NATA
Testing Standard

Project Overview

A property owner in Melbourne's western industrial corridor needed to close and sell a former manufacturing facility that had operated for over two decades. The site had history involving metal coating, chemical storage, and fuel tank operations — all potential sources of soil and groundwater contamination.

Before the property could be transferred, EPA Victoria required a comprehensive environmental assessment demonstrating that contamination had been identified, risks assessed, and an approved remediation strategy was in place. The owner came to GeoMeta to find qualified environmental consultants who could deliver this within strict legal settlement timelines.

Contamination Challenges

Given the site's manufacturing history, the assessment screened for the contaminants most commonly found at Australian industrial sites, guided by EPA Victoria and NEPM requirements:

PFAS from Industrial Processes

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are increasingly found at industrial sites where surface treatment, metal plating, or fire-fighting foams were used. These 'forever chemicals' don't break down naturally and require specialised testing and disposal.

EPA Victoria's PFAS position statement provides guidance on investigation and management requirements

Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Underground storage tanks, fuel depots, and machinery areas commonly leave hydrocarbon contamination in soil and groundwater. Depending on the type and concentration, these can pose risks to human health and the environment.

The National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure provides health-based investigation levels

Heavy Metals

Manufacturing processes involving metals — electroplating, casting, machining — can leave elevated concentrations of lead, chromium, nickel, and zinc in surrounding soils. These persist indefinitely and are a key concern for site rezoning.

NEPM guidelines set health investigation levels for heavy metals based on intended land use

Chlorinated Solvents

Industrial degreasers and cleaning solvents like trichloroethylene (TCE) are common at manufacturing sites. They migrate through soil and dissolve into groundwater, creating contamination plumes that can extend beyond site boundaries.

Australasian Land & Groundwater Association (ALGA) publishes guidance on chlorinated solvent investigation

Services Delivered

Phase 1 — Desktop Study

A thorough review of site history: what was manufactured, what chemicals were used, where tanks and drains were located, and any previous environmental incidents. This identified potential contamination sources and guided the Phase 2 sampling strategy.

Historical aerial photography review
Council records and planning history
Previous environmental reports
Interview with site operators

Phase 2 — Intrusive Investigation

Physical drilling and sampling across the site, targeted at areas identified in Phase 1. Across the 8-hectare site this involved 68 boreholes, groundwater monitoring wells, and soil vapour assessment.

Systematic borehole grid across contamination sources
Groundwater monitoring well installation
NATA-accredited laboratory analysis
Quality assurance / quality control samples

Risk Assessment

Evaluation of whether the identified contamination posed an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment, based on the intended future land use. This determined whether remediation was needed and to what standard.

Comparison against NEPM health investigation levels
Exposure pathway assessment
Ecological risk evaluation
Remediation target development

Remediation Strategy

A practical, cost-effective plan to address the contamination. Options ranged from complete soil removal to in-situ treatment or risk-based containment — the approach chosen depended on contamination type, volume, and future land use.

Cost-benefit analysis of remediation options
Waste classification and disposal planning
EPA Victoria submission and approval
Validation sampling methodology

Project Outcomes

Qualified environmental consultants matched within 72 hours
Phase 1 and Phase 2 assessments completed to EPA Victoria requirements
Contamination sources identified and mapped across the entire site
Waste classification completed for contaminated soil and building materials
EPA regulatory approval achieved for remediation strategy
Site cleared for property transfer and future development
All testing delivered by NATA-accredited partner laboratories
Full compliance documentation maintained for legal and regulatory purposes

Project Timeline

Specialist Matching

Week 1

GeoMeta assessed project requirements and matched the owner with qualified environmental consultants and NATA-accredited labs

Phase 1 Assessment

Months 1-2

Desktop study, site inspection, and preliminary risk assessment to guide investigation

Phase 2 Investigation

Months 3-5

Intrusive drilling, soil and groundwater sampling, NATA-accredited laboratory analysis

Risk Assessment & Strategy

Months 6-7

Contamination mapping, risk evaluation, and remediation strategy development

Regulatory Approval

Month 8

EPA Victoria submission, stakeholder consultation, approval for property transfer

Project Details

Location
Western Melbourne Industrial Corridor
Assessment Period
8 months
Client Type
Property Owner

Services Provided

Environmental Specialist Matching
Phase 1 Site Assessment
Phase 2 Investigation
PFAS Testing
Contamination Mapping
Waste Classification
EPA Compliance Support
NATA Laboratory Coordination

Regulatory References

  • EPA Victoria — Environmental Audit Guidelines
  • NEPM — National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure
  • EPA Victoria — PFAS Position Statement
  • ALGA — Australasian Land & Groundwater Association guidance

Need Environmental Assessment?

Let GeoMeta connect you with qualified environmental consultants for your industrial site.